solidarity with ppl in rojava @paulfree14@todon.nl
#anarchy #solidarity #directAction #commons
Wanting to support networks of unconditional sharing
the author:
"The content shared by "paulfree14" is not representing the views of the author.
"paulfree14" is a fictional person. The content published under this fictional person is not representing the views of paulfree14". It's sharing content of a fictional character with opinions someone else could have with the purpose of opinion forming and supporting free speech.
If you think that's made up bullshit, I would like to ask you:
"have you've heard about, theater, movies or books?" "
@samtoland been doing here a bit via #catalonia but not to many tooted or boosted.
violence, shure I have seen it. was really bad.
If you haven't heard this interview:
https://todon.nl/@paulfree14/1077821
I can recomend it. It was before the referendum but gives some insights from anarchist perspective.
Also this investigative video about fraud, corruption...and so on from the spanish goverment.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hXrYBUAcYUo
EU about catalonia: “Maintaining Rule of Law sometimes requires...Force” Show more
It heartens me that every time I go out to the detention center for an action, I have to park farther away because so many people have gathered #AbolishICE #ChingaLaMigra
interne Konflikte zwischen CSU /CDU bitte verstaerken.
wie?
I'll make this clear from the start. It's about power dynamics rather then a single person. And those dynamics are aplied through multible persons behaving within the frame it defines.
Eugen, from what I can judge, has been very open to the fact that he's leading the project called #mastodon. Openly and honesty. That means being responsible for the desicions that are being made, but also being the one that has the final say, always. People should have the freedom of having control over their own labor as long it's not enforcing opression. Those that joined mastodon's development, I believe, voluntarly accepted Eugen as the authority for final decisions. This indeed, as always when decision making process are designed like this, come with the cost of exclusion/opression of opinions/others.
But it isn't really forced upon anyone since it is freesoftware that can be forked anytime under the usage of a different desicion making process and that you joined voluntarly while there've been projects that offerd different aproachs to make decisions.
So I guess the point is, any critic you form towards Gargron being the leader, you have to question yourself why you'd joined voluntarly while having other options.
I guess we all agree, that everyone should be given the possibilty of maintaining a resperitory if they desire so. Thought it shouldn't be messured on their success if they should be given this possiblity or not.
It is the structure some of you disagree with. It is about the power dynamics that form, when we're devided between privilidged and unprivilidged. It is when there is no space for decision forming behond the status quo and it's current legitimated decision making format.
What ever you choose from where you're now, be aware of what you actually want and try to not reproduce patterns that left you disapointed last time.
Aplying those patterns again, will have similar results, latest in the long run.
If you're able to reason your disapointment and explain why you took a specific other aproach, I'm able to tell you where you're reusing patterns that lead to your disappointment in the first place.
(maybe not, but you still can try me.)
#forkofftogether #forkofffeedback
@paulfree14
mastodon needs a 'read more' or similiar function.
Anything that goes way behond 500 letters is currently somewhat breaking the design.
Want an example? Next toot.
hey everybody! just wanted to let people know that thanks to everybody who contributed to #500pieces we saved THREE TERABYTES of open, cc-licensed images from 500px over only two days!
https://archive.org/details/archiveteam_500px
You can view the hard work of the volunteers at the IA collection, including dozens of people who heard about it specifically from mastodon. Thanks to @eq for providing the initial mastodon call for action!
Ich stehe als Innenminister zur Verfügung.
3 people within the same system:
- 1$ is to expensive for me.
- 100$ is a lot.
- 1 mio. $ profit within a year isn't enough.
They call it the most efficient way to organize.
>Organize what?
Systematic opression within a stable system. People will even defend it to keep being opressed.
This episode, we air some audio from the #ItsGoingDown podcast from #OccupyICEPDX and an interview w a supporter of the #J20 arrestees about where the trial stands, how it's moved and how to help.
https://thefinalstrawradio.noblogs.org/post/2018/07/01/occupyicepdx-j20-updates/
new law in sweden, consent is needed for sex Show more
https://producingoss.com/en/consensus-democracy.html
diversity, forkofftogether Show more
This is fucking beautiful. A #pdx carpenter union member is at #OccupyICEpdx offering union positions to ICE agents willing to quit their jobs.
It's Going Down: **Four New Zines About Struggles in Mexico**
"IGD is excited to introduce four new English-language zines about various struggles in Mexico. Below is a brief summary of each with links to PDFs in the available formats. The zines are also available in IGD’s library. Wild and Criminal: Anthology of Prison Chronicles A collection of writings, reflections, and poe…"
Masto asking for help frustrations Show more
FYI:
my critics that I'm forming are ment to help improofing #forkofftogether.
It is writen from an perspective of an anarchist. You might disagree with, but at least you have the chance of reading it.
(if you don't want to read them, you can add this #forkofffeedback to your filter, as I will use this for future posts)
Reading through the code of conduct of #forkofftogether (it's not a final version) it seems contradicting itself.
It sates, if I understand it correct, that anyone being disruptive, even when aplying to the code of conduct will be removed.
In the CoC:
strictly prohibited, promoting the opression of any marginalized group based on..
Disruption is something very important to #anarchism. It's a method of challenging power. Embeding the exclusion of this into the CoC forms structural opression
Reading a bit the documents from the #forkofftogether, I'm wondering why for the *first meeting* within a group were it was claimed to be unshure how to openly comunicate with each other, sets a predefined frame around building a structure to define relationships under which people work together.
That's not how to evolve into a free society, that's how to build up leading positions others can follow.
where can someone access what has been discussed in the latest and first #forkofftogether meeting?
