@h11
I'm confused by this question. Why do you think as an anarchist supporting netneutrality is contradictory?

@h11 there are a few isps controling the majority of the market. If the netneutrality policy drops, it means more regulative power within their hands.
From what I've got told, in some regions their are just 1 or two isps.
regulated it's anyway. It's just a question by whom and how.

But shure I'd be more happy with self-organized solution like
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guifi.net

@paulfree14 @h11 IMO the biggest mistake libertarians make is believing that removing regulations always increases freedom no matter how un-free the market already is or how powerful the folks are who would have been regulated.

Libertarians need to focus on removing unearned privilege. Removing regulation follows naturally from that.

@h11 @paulfree14 Or to put it another way, any entity, "private" or not, that benefits from government-granted privilege operates as an unaccountable arm of the government.

@paulfree14 @h11 So net neutrality is just government limiting itself. Which should give you a good hint as to why it died.